Wednesday, August 6, 2008

SharonAnderson64a_Libeled with Malice

Wed.6th,Jul08
TO THE ABOVE NAMED: REBUTTAL FROM CANDIDATE
http://sharon4staterep64a.blogspot.com Sharon Scarrella Anderson
Pursuant to Freedom of Speech, it may be prudent for the alleged Bob Johnson to be investigated: COUNT IDefamation and the First Amendment
By information and belief, Apparantly Bobby Johnson who holds himself out to be a Blog Author, he is not an informed "Webmaster: also apparantly is a government informent????
Accusing persons without forensic evidence: seeking Resraining "Orders" without Probable Cause
To Libel with Malice/Slander a Candidate for the MN House of Rep. 64a
the undersigned
Pursuant to the Penality of Perjury Affiant Sharon Anderson has NOT POSTED
on the inferior Blog aka ademocracy, as Sharon's Pic would come up
HOWEVER: in the Nancy Lazaryan Issue, Sharon is an interested person in the Legal Cases of Nancy Lazaryan Consumer Advocate

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1183/1271321666_ae373e62ab.jpg?v=Monday, August 4, 2008

Statutes

Nancy Lazaryan Blogger: A Democracy - Post a Comment YES: the undersigned has posted in the Issues Of Nancy Lazaryan case law

Sites are changed, Archives of Law Library pdf format

Apparantly there may be a few Honest Lawyers, ready to take on the City?
GO GET EM NANCY

http://www.lawlibrary.state.mn.us/archive/supct/0805/OPA061188-0515.pdf
S Y L L A B U S
1. When the express language of a state statute defines the scope of permissible municipal regulations, we determine the validity of municipal regulations on the same subject by applying the plain language of the statute.
2. Under Minn. Stat. § 16B.62, subd. 1 (2006), a municipal rental licensing ordinance regulating components or systems of a residential structure covered by the State Building Code is invalid where the municipal ordinance imposes different requirements than the State Building Code.
3. Inspection standards in a municipal rental licensing ordinance regulating ground fault interrupter receptacles, bathroom ventilation, and egress window covers are invalid under Minn. Stat. § 16B.62, subd. 1, because the inspection standards are building"

4:46 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said... he Law re:

Apparantly Tierney wins on Appeal
http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/416/416.F3d.864.04-3040.html

9:29 AM

FURTHER: IN THE RICO CASE's the extreme poor taste of Blog Manager, appears to destroy
the RICO Cases by Stupid Pic's, Crude inflamatory, statements to undermine the Attorneys Work Product Doctrine: Sharon Anderson, forensic analyst has posted case law, transcriped the cases
also found
United States District Court - District of Minnesota https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEifixw3LzYR29BGxvoGo5ioG1mhjElVzye65E8R3thtJPNSOTivsS-dIQ_ws3DRUxccPP9pUoXJxc11LlZVpZ9agxibl3mPC4JIX0jBO2iV34RyXlT82I4P2g6p_pXVipLvGw9nUgNoiELo/s1600-h/joe-horses_ass03_copy.jpg











Please click onto the COMMENTS for the story.


posted by Bob at Wednesday, July 30, 2008 49 comments links to this post http://www.blogger.com/email-post.g?blogID=http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=

SES: Which th Blog in such poor taste:
Blogger: A Democracy - Post a Comment AFFIANT HAS POSTED CASE LAW:

Federal Files are online
Look at new Site
Suggestion Lawyers Compromise all the time http://www.mnd.uscourts.gov/

Bobby your doing a great job
We all Win if the Landlords Win

Trying to assist with pdf files

http://www.scribd.com/my_docs#

aFederal courts charge 08 cents a page

The Landlords will beat the city if all files are in Order

10:20 AM

Bobby Blog must force the city to put files online in pdf format
We the taxpayers have the Right to know, Further A State and or Federal Jury must be convene

As a victim of Thune,Lanty etc. We also donate time, work product, etc. to help expose the corruption in the City Easier Read and to print one page at a time
http://www.scribd.com/doc/4382395/Steinhauser-et-al-v-City-StPaulMagner-

9:05 AM

APPARANTLY THE CITY - MAGNER ARE GUILTY IN A "PATTERENED ENTERPRISE" TO CONFISCATE ALL PROPERTYS RICO 18USC

THANKS SEEBA, CASE LAW USED AGAINST THE CITY AND YOU AS AN ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY.
INDICTMENTS AGAINST THE CITY MUST ISSUE:
http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/RICO/northwestern_bell.htm

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968, which is Title IX of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (OCCA), imposes criminal and civil liability upon persons who engage in certain "prohibited activities," each of which is defined to include, as a necessary element, proof of a "pattern of racketeering activity," § 1962. "Racketeering activity" means "any act or threat involving" specified state-law crimes, any "act" indictable under specified federal statutes, and certain federal "offenses." § 1961(1). A "pattern" requires "at least two acts of racketeering activity" within a 10-year period. §

8:37 AM

Civil No.: 05-461 JNE/SRN
Frank J. Steinhauser, III, et al.,
please search the web, city has no idea how vast this case is
if nothing else, Steinhauser must implement the city to post files online for public Amicus Curie

http://www.justia.com/search.py?cx=001017683474852908061:ghxovtgkt-8&q=Steinhauser+et+al+v.+St+Paul%2C+City+of+et+al+more%3Alegalweb&cof=FORID%3A11#1219
You bet we back up the TRUTH
Legal Search engines, Cullen an Repke as Licensed Realestate Agents
this case is relevant to ALL

9:55 AM

NOTICE TO THE ALLEGED BOB JOHNSON:
Please do file a restraining "Order" with probable cause of who and how many members and what you are accusing persons in a protected class, Senior, Disabled, Candidate's,
Sharon Anderson ie: Peterson-Chergosky-Scarrella, Homegrown in the
State of Minnesota has not posted with her Name and Pic
in the Chat Room aka ademocracy nor has given any membership fee
and could care less :
United the Blog may have stood legally, Divided its Failure with the loss
of Nancy Lazaryan and Sharon Anderson and Others.
WHO CARES: BILLONS OF BLOGS,,Bogus Libel with Malice
must be addressed.
AND WHAT YOU ARE ACCUSING THEM OF. WHAT RESTRAINTS IN THIS
CHAT ROOM BLOG.
In a message dated 8/5/2008 9:32:00 A.M. Central Daylight Time, rbljohnson@yahoo.com writes:
Listen you crazy wacko, you post at my blog again and I will file a restraining order against you.
Anonymous Grand Jury said...
Bob Johnson, your deceit to have a false pic, of yourself, is questionable, Nancy Lazaryan has far more legal expertise then Cullen or Repke, Your sexist Blog is BS

Grow up punke ie: punk in prison talk is you know what

http://groups.google.com/group/grandjury/browse_thread/thread/73637eab4f67ea81
7:27 AM
Click here: Sharon4Council Disclaimer on Site'sThe Electronic Communications Privacy Act MY FindLaw (ECPA) sets out the provisions for access, use, disclosure, interception and privacy protections of electronic communications. Home Scribd pdf files. The law was enacted in 1986 and covers various forms of wire and electronic communications. According to the U.S. Code, electronic communications "means any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photo electronic or photo optical system that affects interstate or foreign commerce." ECPA prohibits unlawful access and certain disclosures of communication contents. Additionally, the law prevents government entities from requiring disclosure of electronic communications from a provider without proper procedure. The Legal Institute provides Title 18 of the U.S. Code, which encompasses ECPA. Blogger: Dashboard AndersonAdvocates/ddaweborg.msnw
NOTICE: This communication is not encrypted. This e-mail (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and Electronic Communications Privacy Act The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers
Posted by at